Remix is a way of giving new life to something old, just like Dr.
Frankenstein gave new life to an old body. Beyond mere parody and
entertainment, remix can be used to help give younger generations a
greater appreciation for old classics, by presenting them in a way they
can better relate to.
Another important issue surrounding remix is that of copyright.
Originally copyright law was mainly exercised on large corporations, and
its purpose was to protect creativity, not impede it. But today,
copyright targets amateur artists as well, and could potentially hinder
the world of remix. There are two ways this could go. The first one we
refer to as "Read Only" in which a few elite are the creators and
everyone else simply views it, as if in a museum. The second we refer to
as "Read/Write," where people in general are actually encouraged to
contribute to the creating process and add on to and develop off of
other people's ideas.
This becomes a question important to our future generations as well, as to whether common everyday behavior (such as downloading music or attaching pictures from Google to a personal blog) will be considered "legal" or "criminal" behavior. In his book Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy, asks, "How is it changing how [our kids] think about normal, right-thinking behavior? What does it mean to a society when a whole generation is raised as criminals?"
Here we seek to find the balance between a
democracy of creativity and participation while protecting the creative rights of others and preventing a generation of criminals. This is the topic of Fair Use. (more to come.)
No comments:
Post a Comment